|
|
A Central Sewage System for the Hammock? A
Statement by the Hammock Civic Association
Please note: This document
represents a position we adopted in 2004. We are now revisiting it in light of
the recent interest in a new sewer system. The Hammock Civic
Association was founded in 1978 to protect and enhance the quality of life on our
unique barrier island. That remains our
goal, even though we find ourselves defending a diminishing status quo as
development accelerates. We seek ways to
turn development to the island’s advantage, limiting its pernicious effects
while benefiting from the progress it may bring. A new challenge we now face may allow us
to do just that – if we act with vigor and foresight. Local government leaders and commercial
interests have begun to discuss installation of a central sewage system on the
island. Indeed, a preliminary
engineering study is already under way. Hammock residents should take this prospect
seriously. It may happen sooner than
most of us had imagined. It is our view that a central system would
benefit us, were it done in a manner that took everyone’s interests into
account in a balanced way, and were every effort made to take advantage of
government grants and other means to control costs. The disadvantages of septic systems, still widely
used in the Hammock, need no recounting.
One worth stressing at this point, however, is that future development,
if forced to rely on septic systems, will inevitably require clearing large
areas of our natives live oaks and other valuable
trees. We also are deeply concerned, however,
that a central sewer system could be used as an opening, a camel’s nose in the
tent, that could lead some to push for denser residential and perhaps more
intense commercial use of the limited available land on this fragile barrier
island. We would vigorously oppose such
an outcome. We do not see this issue as a zero-sum
game. Those who have doubts about a
central system as well as those who unreservedly support it can come together
to find a solution acceptable to all. We set out below what we believe are
criteria that, taken as a whole, both sides should be able to support. We are
aware that implementation of these criteria would require discussion on their
details. First, our central
concern. Before the system is
begun, the Hammock community, county officials, and representatives of
commercial interests should, through consultation, come to a firm consensus on
residential and commercial density limitations in the Hammock. Those limitations should adhere to the vision
provided by the Charrette exercise and by the A1A
Corridor Management Plan. They should be
incorporated in both county zoning and the county’s Comprehensive Plan. We urge the county to play a guiding role in
this effort and to begin work on it as soon as possible. We stress that the central sewer system,
if installed, must remain true to the vision developed in the Charrette by government, professionals and citizens working
together in a fully, in fact nearly ideally, democratic way. Most residents of the Hammock, we believe,
support the Charrette enthusiastically. It foresees, in more detail than we can
repeat here, a Hammock with low intensity commercial use clustered at key
points along A1A, and low to moderate density residential use. If we are not true to that vision we will
become simply another strip mall along the coast, and we all, including
commercial property owners, will suffer from it. Second, the system should be managed by a
government entity. The present regulatory regime allows severe abuse of the
environment (and customers) by privately-owned waste systems. Ocean City Utilities of Beverly Beach is a
case in point. A government-run entity
would not be perfect, but would be more sensitive to the needs of the voting
citizenry. Extension of the Third, before the treatment plant is
placed on the barrier island, every effort should be made to ensure that other
options are not feasible. Were the plant
placed on the island, the effluent should receive tertiary treatment. The plant should not
discharge any of its treated effluent into the Fourth, the system should not take
priority over the Hammock’s natural beauty and living resources. Installation
of the system should take place without significant damage to any valuable
resource, be it a tree over a certain size or natural drainage system. Fifth, should hook-up be mandatory for
existing septic tank owners, provision should be made in cases of financial or
other need to delay hook-up or for maximally flexible payment plans. Sixth, any lift stations or other
above-ground evidence of the system should be blended, as much as possible, into
the surrounding landscape. We look forward to the installation of a
sewer system that meets these criteria.
All property owners, commercial or residential, will be the better off
for it. |